Elizabeth Mandlik vs Eva Vedder Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Mar at 08:13 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Mandlik vs E. Vedder

USA
2
Win
Played
2
Win

NED
2
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Mandlik 2 - 2 Vedder
They have played 9 sets in total, with Elizabeth Mandlik winning 5 and Eva Vedder winning 4. The last match between Eva Vedder and Elizabeth Mandlik was at the Copa Colsanitas - Bogota, 29-03-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Eva Vedder getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mandlik | 2 |
| Vedder | 2 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Copa Colsanitas - Bogota(03-29-25)
(Q3) Merida Open Akron - Merida(10-27-24)
(F) W25 Florianopolis(01-30-22)
E. Mandlik vs E. Vedder H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $317,135 | Career Prize Money | $12,205 |
| 56.66% (200-153) | Career Total W/L | 58.35% (262-187) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 2 | Hard | 1 |
| 9 | Titles | 4 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (1-2) |
E. Mandlik vs E. Vedder Match Preview:
When considering the second serve performance, who holds the edge? Over the last six months, we observe that Mandlik secures 38.86% of points on her second serve, whereas Vedder edges out with 44.18%. This crucial metric often aligns closely with predicting the outcome of matches. Shifting our focus to return games, Mandlik takes the lead by winning 54.79% of her opponent's second serve points, compared to Vedder's 48.23%. Similarly, first serve return success is in Mandlik's favor at 34.87%, overshadowing Vedder's 30.44%, both useful indicators in forecasting this head-to-head encounter.
Under pressure, Vedder demonstrates a slightly better ability to save break points with a rate of 46.9% compared to Mandlik’s 45.74%. This insight can be particularly significant for those interested in in-game betting. Examining their overall performance, Mandlik has won 51.61% of her matches in the past year, whereas Vedder takes the lead with a 58.9% win rate, providing a comprehensive view of their capabilities. Both players thrive on Hard surfaces with Mandlik and Vedder boasting a 59% win rate; however, Mandlik fares much worse on I.hard (13%), and Vedder struggles most on Grass (50%).
Diving into player level participation, Mandlik navigates the Challengers/ITF circuit with a 53.49% success rate in the past year, while Vedder maintains a higher win rate of 59.68% within the same category. Contextual performance on the tournament scale further shapes the favorite in this matchup. Considering their direct head-to-head battles, the scales tip slightly towards Mandlik, having triumphed in two out of three previous clashes. Their most recent encounter at the Merida Open Akron saw Mandlik claiming a decisive 6-1, 6-1 victory, with their average match time recorded at 1:10:34.
In scenarios of extreme pressure, such as tiebreaks, Vedder has a perfect record of 2-0 against Mandlik. Yet, neither player has secured a victory in a deciding set when pitted against each other, creating intrigue should this contest go the full distance. When facing varying ranks, Mandlik’s opponents average a rank of 285.63, while Vedder competes against slightly lower-ranked players with an average of 351.22. Particularly in deciding sets across all matches in the past year, Vedder again leads with a 48% win rate compared to Mandlik's 39%.
Their breakpoint conversion rates further influence potential outcomes; Mandlik outshines Vedder, converting 40.7% of her opportunities, while Vedder stands at 36.99%. As these two athletes prepare to face off, the stats suggest a finely balanced match, yet with Mandlik's slight advantage in head-to-head and break conversions, she might just edge out a victory.
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Eva Vedder Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Mandlik vs E. Vedder H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 50 | Games Won | 38 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 19 | Total Double Faults | 20 |
| 1:25:4 | Average Match Time | 1:25:4 |
| 50% (129/259) | 1st Serve % | 52% (117/225) |
| 71% (91/129) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (74/117) |
| 46% (60/130) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (54/108) |
| 57% (13/23) | Break Pts Won % | 35% (8/23) |
| 43% (97/225) | Return Points Win % | 42% (108/259) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (2/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (1/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Mandlik Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
E. Vedder Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 1-6 6-2 7-6(7) | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
F | W | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
SF | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

E. Mandlik vs E. Vedder Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.66% (200/153) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.35% (262/187) |
| 55.41% (456/367) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.64% (592/435) |
| 52.86% (3998/3565) | Games Win/Loss | 53.46% (5050/4397) |
| 59.28% (115/79) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.74% (92/62) |
| 54.96% (72/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.88% (158/115) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.56% (10/8) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 572 | Aces Total | 1085 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1505 | Total Double Faults | 1111 |
| 1:33:5 | Average Match Time | 1:32:14 |
| 391.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.92 |
| 56% (12849/22906) | 1st Serve % | 58% (15464/26566) |
| 63% (8031/12849) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (9874/15431) |
| 45% (4491/10056) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5433/11157) |
| 52% (1540/2987) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1582/3273) |
| 48% (10931/22928) | Return Points Win % | 46% (12343/27110) |
| 47.83% (11/12) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 50.00% (23/23) | Main Tour W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 56.60% (120/92) | Challenger W/L | 56.73% (156/119) |
| 72.41% (42/16) | Futures W/L | 62.75% (96/57) |
| 56% (197/349) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (257/442) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 38% (25/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (46/97) |
| 51% (62/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (62/135) |
| 86% (195/168) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (279/233) |
| 14% (195/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (279/44) |
| 20% (158/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (170/28) |